Luxury is the opposite of vulgarity.


Well, I think it is time to speak clearly about some things.

What exactly should be the concept of ¨Luxury¨?. The extraordinaire founder of all these things Ms. Coco Chanel used to say: ¨Luxury is the opposite of vulgarity¨.

According to this, I guess we should all thoroughly review this concept that is worryingly beginning to get ¨diluted¨ (into I do not ¨what¨), step by step in this 21st. Century. You just have to check in Instagram for the hashtag ¨#Luxury¨, and I guess you will realize what I am trying to mean now.



I mean we should necessary begin to make a stop and think about all these things carefully, before we kill ¨that goose¨. Specially now when the Luxury Industry presents its best global perspectives ever for the near future, with a 9%/year growth up to the year 2025, driven by a growing Chinese middle class and a recovery in more mature worldwide markets, such as the new Millenials era; that ¨tech-savy¨ generation that will represent 45 percent of overall luxury consumption, with Asian consumers accounting for more than half.

The biggest reference worldwide in the Luxury Market, the Jumeirah Group, is about to expand its hotel offer with at least five new resorts and the launch of a new lifestyle brand. The other ¨giant¨ in this context, the Marriot Group, is planning to open 40 Luxury Hotels in 2018, which demonstrates we are already IN a new golden era of Luxury.




However, I guess we are doing something wrong when experts need to incise the concepts of ¨real Luxury¨, or ¨true Luxury¨, as if they were forced to make a difference for what might be currently happening.

..Can we conceive as ¨Luxury¨ the first tourist trip around the Moon planned for the end of 2018??.

..Is ¨that¨ what Ms. Coco Chanel was referring as ¨Luxury¨ in the 20th. Century??.

..Or on the other hand, are we changing the rules now??. Are we considering ¨Luxury¨ as for instance the beach club parties where attendants spray 1,000eu. bottles of champagne??.

Because this is really happening today, and I guess these numbers are also included in all the ¨analysis¨ related to the future of the Luxury Industry. In this sense, I am afraid we might be unconsciously creating a new market bubble where the concept of ¨Luxury¨ is just becoming a powerful tool for the client attraction.




In the current moment when plenty of ¨outsiders¨ are entering the market of Luxury, I guess ¨exclusivity¨ is something that begins to lose its essence. Now, everybody with ¨simply money¨ can afford what before was just reserved for the privileged. This is a process with no apparent limit, that probably began with the gestation of the new generation of rich sportsmen who raised from non-privileged environments. People that began to behave like most of the current ¨Millenials¨ do today.

In this way, it would be really opportune to make an exhaustive balance for what the National Basketball Association (NBA) was in the USA thirty years ago, and what it has really become these days. Make a proper comparison for what players like Julius Erving, Magic Johnson or Michael Jordan behaved in their golden days, and the current celebrities that surpass this sport today. I do not just mean tattoos or mega cars (probably everything began through the forward Dennis Rodman). I mean getting out of jail to play the games.

..And I guess this is sadly and worryingly detrimental for the current concept of ¨Luxury¨. In the end, we all have to be aware of how Millenials behave today as their heroes do. The ¨monster¨ is already being fed.




The ¨real¨ luxury traveler already knows about all these things, and the industry must now adjust its strategies to the new ¨tsunami¨ that it will face in the next few years. I think it is time for the ¨unique experiences¨ conceived as ¨high class actions¨, not based in tangible resources but inapproachable and educated live enjoyments.

In this sense, CREATIVITY will be the next powerful tool to satisfy the high expectations for ¨exclusivity¨, that Luxury consumers will demand from now on. Luxury providers will be forced to create authentic ¨lifestyles¨, more than just fleeting moments.

According to this, 1. influence at the time of attending events will gain prominence to the detriment of the affluence. 2. Wellness will beat the eccentricity. 3. Authenticity will end up with vulgarity. 4. Education will delimit the class.  5. Segmentation will prevail over the crowds. 6. Limited editions will become the real trend. 7. Ethical offers will be a must. 8. Long term exclusive  attention will make the difference. 9. Engagement will build customer fidelity. 10. Higher prices will make ¨Luxury¨ just affordable for the real luxury consumers. These are my personal trends for the next years.

Definitely, ¨once in a lifetime experiences¨ will give rise to the next ¨Real Luxury¨ providers. In this way, I would say the Luxury Market will get into a new era of ¨Status¨. We are in the moment of determining the differences for the ¨High Class Luxury¨ versus the ¨Low Class Luxury¨.

The first ones leading this challenge, will place their brands in the new coming market. The same one that probably will rescue the essence of what Ms. Coco Chanel spoke about once.





Event trends for 2018. The Year for the ¨exclusive interaction¨.

2018 1

This is the moment when you can read lots of ¨Year 2017´s annual balances¨ and ¨2018´s trends¨. Among all these last ones, I found a 22 trend selection article from Eventbrite which I think ¨rocks¨. Everything what you can read there is really opportune (..well, I do not agree with trend #14 but the rest is wicked, you can draw plenty of conclusions. Congrats Ms. Bel Booker, the author).

According to all this, I decided to brief what I consider the ¨tendencies¨ for the Year 2018 in the industry of events as following now.


I need to warn the reader first:

Everything contained in this post is written under an estimation of ¨normal market conditions¨ for the Year 2018. This means: Mr. Donald Trump´s assertion of Jerusalem will not affect the global market of events, neither a possible war with North Korea, or a hypothetical global recession according to whichever convulsing news.



I think 2018 will be the year for ¨live interactive events¨. From now on, nothing will be useful unless you do not make your real target interact with your product, with your network or with your environment. In this way, this will be the year of ¨Family Events¨, understood as people with deep affinities meeting and joining all together, like a kind of ¨family¨ around your objectives pursued. Now massive business concentrations will get more and more selective at the precise moment of making their calls, in order to find the ¨affinity and reciprocity¨ between the attendants.  It will be not more valid just generating ¨irrelevant cold leads¨ for a huge database, just because you missed the opportunity of making people live ¨AUTHENTIC EXPERIENCES¨ with you first.

From now on, big trade fairs will be forced to make ¨selective atmospheres¨ for their real potential targets. This thing called the ¨professional days¨ is currently becoming a joke (..I guess I am not the only one saying this). And now the real professional targets demand ¨real professional workshops¨, in order to obtain the ¨real professional interaction ¨ for their network interests. This is what commonly is known as ¨separate the chaff from the wheat¨.

There will be smaller incentives, smaller presentations, smaller conventions and even smaller weddings too. Everything will get more ¨exclusive¨ from now on, and this will mean everything will get more ¨accurate¨ too. In this sense, the proposals from all of us the event planners,  will must offer the professional level as expected by the clients, according to their real potential targets; the direct ¨shot¨ towards the affinity of their key audiences. Everything conceived as a search for the ¨excellence¨ and the budget optimization, delivering end to end selective live experiences, according to the objectives previously marked.

A kind of ¨delicacy events¨ gathering ¨key people¨. I guess that will be great for everybody.

2018 3



We will see new methods of real human interaction (beyond technology interaction) among the attendants. Probably many of the new experiences will be based on the traditional team building techniques, applied now to this new kind of ¨Family events¨.

I guess we will see as well an advance for new technologies specifically generated for the ¨live emplacement interaction¨, more effective than the ¨distant social networks¨, via mobile apps or video games working at the place. This will make the attendants of an event, real ¨influencers¨ in their social networks later, when they share their experiences as ¨leading agents¨ of an action. From now on, the corporate brands will get ¨desirable¨ by the human role evidenced by their audiences at their experiences offered.

This will be as well the year for the internet big influencers and masters of ceremonies with REAL PR SKILLS, such as all the secondary participating agents of an event as hostesses, chefs, assistants, coaches and entertainers, who will have necessarily to play a new more ¨human¨ role on behalf of the ¨interaction¨. They will become an strategic active part of the new events generation.

2018 2

The cyborg anthropologist Amber Case (USA, 1987) said it clearly just four days ago in Madrid: ¨Technology is not bad, but its use is disconnecting us. We will solve it giving space to think and live real experiences¨.

Innovation vs. Improvement in events.


-I am deeply mindful of this.-

What is an ¨innovation¨?.  Where are the ¨innovations¨ at the whole IPhone´s history?. Probably, as global speaker Gijs van Wulfen says in his wise article (highly recommended), the only real innovation comes with the first IPhone´s version, when nothing existed before. After this, everything becomes an ¨improvement¨ in the whole process, even tough everybody finally perceives the IPhone as a ¨constant innovation¨ process. Here we would enter now the field of the ¨commercial strategies¨.

And this an appropriate example for what I want to mean in these lines today.

¨Innovating¨ is, for instance, generating a first worldwide hotel in Japan managed by robots. Technology supplies the human relations, and destiny lies in the artificial intelligence´s hands. That is today a complete revolution that might get successful in the future, or in the other hand, it could be a total failure. This is the risk that ¨innovators¨ assume when they are pioneering. In this case, this hotel was created ten months ago in Tokyo, and probably we will know the final balance of the action in minimum two years .





In the events industry, time frames are regularly associated to the ¨present results¨, so I guess it is really impossible to ¨real innovate¨ as we know the concept, without waiting for a minimum 2-year long process of analysis and monitoring before we decide if that ¨real innovation¨ worked. In this sense, innovation is not ¨magic¨, just lottery is if you are really lucky. This means, you do not have literally the chance for ¨experimenting¨, unless money is not a first priority.

As I said above, ¨innovation¨ gets into a ¨commercial perception¨ for all the communication strategies. Everything gets ¨desirable¨ when it is conceived as ¨innovative¨, and all the current markets for whichever field you want to imagine now, work like this (who did not ever read anything about an ¨innovative¨ product, idea, person or place?). Andrew Weinreich was a real innovator with his first social network (SixDegrees), and later Mark Mark Zuckerberg became the real ¨developer¨ who reached the success through the improvement. That is ¨Facebook¨.

This artificial-commercial status about ¨innovators¨ is usually not a real fact about ¨innovation¨ (in my opinion), when many times it just becomes a kind of ¨experimental laboratory¨ for new experiencers, that just sell their products from their buyers´ trust. Sometimes ¨innovative¨ actions do not improve results, they just create intangible concepts (..the IPhone´s detractors know this very well). It is well known for instance, that computer programmers do not like to use the latest versions of the operating systems, and they prefer using their current ones while they work, until the new versions in the market are completely established against failures. So the question for all of us in this moment is: ¨Why innovate?¨.




The concept of ¨innovation¨ should always be shared with a real perception about what your actions contribute for your target; ¨how¨ you optimize your strategy according to your tools. Otherwise, ¨innovation¨ might get the risk of becoming just a ¨disappointment¨ for your audience, according to the expectations generated before executing an action. An innovation should not go further than ¨what I can do my best for my audience to feel their best¨. In this way, I always say to my clients ¨improve yourself making everybody perceive you are innovating. But just improve, forget the risk¨. All the most successful cases worldwide do not risk in ¨innovative ideas¨, when their processes still work perfectly. Politicians, celebrities, multinational corporations… they are all in a constant ¨improvement¨ in search of the optimization, making their strategies adequate to the real needs. ¨Innovation¨ is for scientifics, and ¨vanguard¨ is for artists. A good event planner should battle for the ¨EXCELLENCE¨.




I guess this is something that today is not being considered as relevant as should be. In fact, now you can see relevant ¨event gurus¨ that are repositioning their strategies as new ¨event consultants¨ for big companies. There is currently a huge new niche for them. They advise their clients about what is innovative and what is not, where should they invest and where should not, who they should work with and who not… They ¨optimize¨ the sector according to the new rules, the new tools and the future potential (…and that is great, we really need them). But they will never try to ¨experiment¨ when they are forced to demonstrate results.

In this way, I know very well Mr. Fermin Perez -ex CEO from ¨Global Events¨ agency, one of the biggest references in the events industry worldwide- for his new reference ¨Event Maker¨ in Spain, and I know for sure he would never put a penny in risk from his clients, when he is speaking about ¨innovative ideas¨. His most powerful resource is ¨CREATIVITY¨ in the artistic direction; when a group of mermaids can be more powerful than the latest app.





Lots of companies pursue the ¨surprise¨ for their targets within technological/conceptual ¨innovations¨ that can make them different from their competition. This is understandable, but I think they are mistaking when they are ignoring that the final balance of every event, is more related to the human perception for the network relations perceived in the action, than just ¨technology¨.  ..And today lots of event planners sadly fall in similar mistakes.

You can make a presentation of a new car in the market that comes flying from the sky, dress the venue with a last generation´s led lighting effects, make everybody interact with a huge screen through their mobiles,.. you can ¨innovate¨ with all these things, but if people do not how to use the interacting system, or if they forget ¨who¨ they have surrounding them, if the attendants just enjoy the event as ¨individual automatons¨, if you definitely do not make the whole context behave ¨HUMANLY¨, definitely you will be wasting your money.


In this case, innovation will never get into the improvement but the ¨instant impact¨. That is no bad (..who does not like special effects?, I love them!), but I guess you should never base your event just on ¨innovation¨. Relevant worldwide references like ¨Cirque du Soleil¨ (Canada) or ¨La Fura del Baus¨ (Spain) are famous for that other powerful tool which, beyond technological innovation, it is simply called ¨IMAGINATION¨.


This rule is completely applicable to many other environments, and this is why my professional claim will always be ¨IDEAS THAT WORK¨. Forget ¨experimenting¨, and let´s go for the improvement. Do not jeopardize results; there is no better invention that what never failed before. IPhone knows it too, and its batteries never exploded. Samsung was in the forced moment to ¨innovate¨.




Event yourself or die.


This article in the LinkedIn is a ¨must read¨. It is an interview with Chairman of VaynerX and CEO of VaynerMedia Gary Vaynerchuk, on the future of Luxury Brands in a Millennial World.

In the chat, Gary V. makes an opportune analysis about how the World is currently changing in terms of communication, …and how the system is not doing it yet. In this way, he speaks about some private conversations with company directors that are still ¨hooked on the past¨ by generational traditions, by education, or simply by comfort. People that still bet for traditional communication platforms investments as tv or print advertising, when the new generations do not watch tv or read newspapers any more. This is a total statement for a system that is in a complete process of renovation (transformation), and where the ¨past awards¨ in advertising are now getting useless.

We are in a current World where vanguard brands are beginning to redirect their ¨shots¨ into the digital platforms as social network sites, influencers and video games. All the rules are being rewritten, there will be soon a new establishment completely different to this current one as we know it, and probably the current lack of the new generations´education helps for all these things. In a few years (probably right now), whoever does not build a proper digital context, will be ¨out of the photo¨. The biggest evidence is that hackers now are becoming the most important tools to win elections.

There is a practical hint for all these things in the big circus of Formula One. They just made it public 3 days ago, with their new unveiled corporate logo. An image that ¨breaths¨ the video game industry, and that makes people can guess where the things are going on right now. I think it is a proper strategy for the sponsorship attraction

..At the same time, just six days before, driver Fernando Alonso was becoming the first Formula One driver to branch out into eSports, after launching his own team ahead of the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. The ¨olden days minds¨ would think about what the need is for one of the best payed drivers; the vanguard ones support the idea of ¨adapt or die¨.



The thing is, I would say that we will probably see soon (not far) the extinction of the company sales networks as we know them now, something that today still sounds crazy for directives (..I have some similar battles as Gary Vaynerchuk too). In this sense, who will need them having in their hands digital communication platforms that allow the companies to keep in permanent touch with their clients?. Effective influencers and formed community managers will replace them, trust me.

The close-future that is already absorbing us will also build proper direct distribution channels between manufacturers and their clients, that will make disappear the physical shops as we know them too (even online current intermediaries as huge Amazon will be in risk of extinction when companies develop their own ¨portals¨). And probably just the corporate client attention centers will subsist. otherwise we would deeply enter the ¨Capital dictatorship¨ era.

With just these two ¨strategic¨ advances, we will be in the disposition to say that companies will be SELF-SUFFICIENT soon.

Who will need ¨marketing¨ in this context?.

Well, in my opinion a product will always need to be ¨desirable¨, whenever the Century we are in. And here is when the word ¨events¨ enters action. In the same way as the Formula One needs the races to sell video games, the whole Worldwide industry will need events and public relations to make their products ¨attractive¨ (that´s my duty). Influencers are fed events, and social network contents are fed events too. Rihanna would never be capable to sell her ¨RiRi¨ fragance without her concerts, and her facebook would never be collapsed by never-ending followers without the videos from those concerts. ¨Events¨ is where everything begins: the influencers are build in events, the contents are based in events, and the products are alive through events. Call it ¨concerts¨, ¨rodashows¨, ¨presentations¨ or just ¨parties¨, for whichever sector you want to imagine: computers, clothing, food, tourism or banking.

And one more thing, this is what worries me the most: this process of social lack-education that Gary Vaynerchuk was mentioning in his interview, will make the influencers even more stronger than what they are currently. They will be more ¨trustable¨ according to the blind non-education, which means in the future they will not have to ¨hide¨ their subliminal messages as they are still forced to today. I guess people soon will ask them directly about what to buy and what to not buy, …and in this moment, the whole system as we know it today will fall down. Directives will have to follow the commands of their influencers. This is scary.

No todo es ¨huella histórica¨.


Acabo de leer una noticia sobre el descubrimiento que ha ¨sufrido¨ el Museo Mexicano de San Francisco para su colección de Arte Prehispánico. El caso es que tras solicitar un informe a expertos de Arte Maya para su colección de más de dos mil piezas, el resultado del análisis es ciertamente sorprendente: apenas 83 tienen calidad para ser expuestas en un museo de ámbito nacional. El resto (casi el 96% de la colección) son irrelevantes o son directamente falsas.

A colación de esta noticia viene mi comentario de hoy. Hace escasamente un año estuve visitando el Museo Anahuacalli de Diego Rivera en Coyoacán, Ciudad de México. El lugar es imponente, digno de un faraón egipcio. Sólo por este hecho, ya merece una visita que se me antoja imprescindible para los amantes del Arte y la Arquitectura. Se aprende mucho, es un auténtico ¨templo indigenista de Siglo XX¨ en su máxima expresión.

El caso es que tras hacer la visita guiada al lugar organizada desde el centro, uno se da cuenta de la magnificiencia de Diego Rivera en muchos otros campos del Humanismo aparte de la propia pintura como es universalmente conocido, como lo son su afán arquitectónico y sobre todo, el coleccionismo y amor hacia el Arte Prehispánico. Aparentemente Rivera era un comprador compulsivo para todo lo que le llegaba a sus manos en dicha materia, llegando a amasar una colección de más de cincuenta mil piezas en su ingente colección que armó en vida.  ..Eso, tirando de calculadora, es un equivalente a comprar 2 piezas al día durante toda su vida, para los largos 71 años de vida que duró el artista desde el mismo día que nació. ..Eso está a la altura de muy pocos en este Planeta, y obvia decir que es la colección de Arte Prehispánico más grande del Mundo.

Ttras hacer un repaso a las más de dos mil piezas precolombinas expuestas al público en dicho museo entre platos, vasijas y esculturas, a mí me vino a la mente la pregunta del millón que finalmente no se me supo responder:

¨Si realmente Diego era tan impulsivo a la hora de la compra, y de forma paralela sin tener conocimiento de que realmente tuviera a su alrededor un equipo de expertos asesores para la adquisición de piezas, que de alguna forma hiciese la criba de poder garantizar ¨qué piezas¨ eran susceptibles de compra frente a ¨qué otras piezas¨ no eran susceptibles de adquisición, y ante la mera probabilidad de encontrarse el propio Diego ante una copia o falsificación, entonces ¿quién puede garantizar que todo lo que está acá expuesto en el Museo y que acabamos de ver, es pieza original prehispánica o por el contrario, pieza falsa que le hayan podido meter a un comprador impulsivo?¨.

La mujer que ese día hacía de guía en el Museo no pudo más que decirme: ¨nadie puede hacer eso, probablemente sea como usted dice, y por consecuencia existe un margen de riesgo y chance para pensar de que parte de lo que acá se ve, no sea auténtico¨.

…No sé, aquello fue un jarro de agua para mí, todo esto me dio mucho que pensar en su momento, y hoy en parte se confirma con la noticia del Museo de San Francisco. ..La dolorosa conclusión es que tal vez estemos hoy viviendo una ¨realidad virtual¨ de tiempos antepasados,  sustentada por una base cognitiva que no sea del todo ¨auténtica¨. Y si eso fuera así, me sirve cualquier mentalidad crítica con afán analítico, que simplemente afronte la realidad con un espíritu acorde a los tiempos que vivimos. A mí personalmente, me provoca una enorme admiración el hecho de que el Museo de San Francisco no sólo se haya atrevido a solicitar ese informe (probablemente ya tenían sospechas previas para dar este paso), sino que a la vez alabo la decisión de hacer público ese resultado, asumiendo una realidad que genera un auténtico ¨revolcón¨ a todo un proyecto, pero que de forma constructiva hace ¨aporte histórico¨ a una nueva forma de entender nuestro pasado.



-Una colección de arte mexicano para tirar a la basura.

-Museo Anahuacalli.